목요일에 대법원은 트럼프 대통령의 새 규칙에 대해 이야기했어요. 이 규칙은 미국에서 태어난 사람들의 권리를 제한하려 했어요. 대법원은 이 규칙을 막으려고 노력하면서, 비슷한 다른 법원 명령들을 어떻게 줄일 수 있을지 고민하는 것 같았습니다.

It was not clear what would happen, but most of the Supreme Court worried about what might happen if the Trump government could refuse citizenship to children born in the U.S. to people living there illegally, even for a short time.

The highest court heard arguments about a case. The previous government wanted the court to quickly change a lower court's orders. These orders stopped the government from limiting citizenship across the country.

The nationwide order stopped President Trump's plans to change the government, which made him and his supporters in the Republican party feel more and more annoyed.

변호사 D. 존 소어는 트럼프 대통령이 두 번째 임기를 시작한 후, 법원에서 40개의 명령이 나왔다고 법원에 말했습니다. 그는 두 시간 동안 이 문제에 대해 이야기했습니다.

The government asked the Supreme Court to quickly deal with the issue of citizenship for people born in the country. This is because it's one of many immigration problems they're working on.

이런 일은 빨리 이야기되고 해결될 수 있고, 전국에서 사용될 수도 있습니다.

하지만 소어는 에이미 코니 배럿 대법관 같은 사람들 질문에 트럼프 정부가 소송에 반대하거나 재판을 늦추려고 할 수 있다고 말했습니다.

It is rare for the Supreme Court to talk about urgent appeals. Usually, they discuss the main issues of a disagreement.

The government hasn't asked the Supreme Court about a bigger problem yet. If the Supreme Court agrees with the government about stopping the order across the country, it's not clear how long different rules about citizenship will affect children born in the U.S.

We think they will make the final decision by the end of June.