In a stinging rebuke to presidential overreach, a Massachusetts federal judge decisively enjoined President Trump's concerted effort to unilaterally restructure U.S. elections, siding with a cohort of Democratic state attorneys general who successfully argued the executive action's inherent unconstitutionality; Trump's March executive order, predicated on mandating documentary proof of citizenship for voter registration, stipulating absolute adherence to an Election Day receipt deadline for mailed ballots, and conditioning federal election grant disbursements upon states' capitulation to said deadline, was summarily dismantled, notwithstanding the White House's spurious defense predicated on ensuring electoral probity; Judge Denise J. Casper, in her meticulously reasoned judgment, asserted the states' demonstrable likelihood of prevailing on the merits, underscoring the Constitution's conspicuous silence regarding presidential authority over electoral administration, simultaneously striking down the order's provision mandating the wholesale rejection of postal ballots arriving post-Election Day—this ruling represents the second juridical setback for Trump's controversial directive, echoing a prior injunction issued by a Washington D.C. judge which similarly curtailed the reach of the presidential fiat.