The trans athlete, A.B. Hernandez, securing gold in both the women's high jump and triple jump at the California Interscholastic Federation track and field championships, catalyzed a maelstrom of controversy and transfixed the national gaze, especially given that Hernandez competed under newly revised CIF regulations stipulating the addition of an extra qualifying female competitor to any event in which Hernandez met the established criteria, thus ensuring expanded representation and ameliorating potential displacement of cisgender athletes.

儘管 Hernandez 的卓越表現已然確立，賽場內外反對跨性別運動員參與女子體育賽事的聲浪依舊甚囂塵上，構成了一種揮之不去的不和諧氛圍；加州校際體育協會（CIF），為應對 Hernandez 所引發的爭議，同時亦為遵守加州法律——該法律賦予跨性別學生依其自我認同性別參與相應組別體育隊伍之權利——遂頒布了此項備受矚目的新政，然此舉隨即招致尖銳批評，論者謂此修正案實乃打開潘朵拉之盒，徒增社會群體間之齟齬與混亂。

The genesis of this controversy coincides with a recent poll indicating that approximately 70% of American adults espouse the view that transgender female athletes should be categorically barred from participation in women's and girls' competitive sports, irrespective of the level of competition.